Deflationary Coins
12,552 coins #9 Page 13| | Coins | | | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | |||||
| The coins below are ranked lower due to missing data. Learn more | |||||
| | 601 | | $ | -2.05% | |
| | 602 | | $ | -0.30% | |
| | 603 | | $ | -1.03% | |
| | 604 | | $ | -0.70% | |
| | 605 | | $ | +2.39% | |
| | 606 | | $ | -2.59% | |
| | 607 | | $ | -0.34% | |
| | 608 | | $ | -0.69% | |
| | 609 | | $ | -1.83% | |
| | 610 | | $ | +0.68% | |
| | 611 | | $ | +1.81% | |
| | 612 | | $ | -1.61% | |
| | 613 | | $ | +0.07% | |
| | 614 | | $ | -0.35% | |
| | 615 | | $ | -0.99% | |
| | 616 | | $ | -4.38% | |
| | 617 | | $ | -4.07% | |
| | 618 | | $ | +0.28% | |
| | 619 | | $ | -0.43% | |
| | 620 | | $ | -1.03% | |
| | 621 | | $ | +0.04% | |
| | 622 | | $ | -35.49% | |
| | 623 | | $ | -2.54% | |
| | 624 | | $ | +16.77% | |
| | 625 | | $ | -10.48% | |
| | 626 | | $ | +0.02% | |
| | 627 | | $ | -2.27% | |
| | 628 | | $ | -0.01% | |
| | 629 | | $ | -70.30% | |
| | 630 | | $ | -2.38% | |
| | 631 | | $ | -2.41% | |
| | 632 | | $ | -0.36% | |
| | 633 | | $ | -0.64% | |
| | 634 | | $ | -1.38% | |
| | 635 | | $ | -2.89% | |
| | 636 | | $ | -1.21% | |
| | 637 | | $ | +0.38% | |
| | 638 | | $ | -0.72% | |
| | 639 | | $ | -1.32% | |
| | 640 | | $ | +292.12% | |
| | 641 | | $ | -14.08% | |
| | 642 | | $ | -0.18% | |
| | 643 | | $ | -0.76% | |
| | 644 | | $ | -3.42% | |
| | 645 | | $ | -1.18% | |
| | 646 | | $ | -0.30% | |
| | 647 | | $ | -1.03% | |
| | 648 | | $ | -0.02% | |
| | 649 | | $ | -0.21% | |
| | 650 | | $ | -0.51% | |
Trending Deflationary Coins
| Coins | Price | 24h | |
|---|---|---|---|
| | | $ | -2.18% |
| | | $ | -0.56% |
| | | $ | -0.70% |
| | | $ | -1.69% |
| | | $ | -4.98% |
Top gainers
| Coins | | | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | $ | +53.72% | ||
| | | $ | +28.80% | ||
| | | $ | +21.76% | ||
| | | $ | +21.21% | ||
| | | $ | +12.40% | ||
| All gainers | |||||
What Are Deflationary Tokens?
Deflationary tokens are cryptocurrencies engineered to shrink circulating supply over time. Through burns, buy-backs, or ever-slower issuance, they aim to create scarcity that—if demand holds or grows—may push unit prices higher. The mechanism is transparent and on-chain, but never a guarantee of value; utility and market interest still rule.
Quick Facts
- Core idea: Net-reduction in tokens (or in issuance rate) → potential supply/demand asymmetry.
- Burn mechanics:
- Protocol burns – % of every tx auto-destroyed (e.g., 1% of each transfer).
- Buy-back & burn – team/DAO uses revenue to market-buy tokens and send to 0x…dEaD.
- Scheduled burns – quarterly events, milestone burns, or halving-like block-reward drops.
- Utility sinks – tokens spent in-game, for NFT mints, or naming services are permanently removed.
- Transparency: Burns are viewable on-chain; verify contract code and burn address supply.
- ≠ price up only: A 50% supply drop with 90% demand loss still nets lower market cap.
Deflationary Patterns You’ll Meet
- Capped-supply + falling issuance – Bitcoin-style halvings (dis-inflationary until 21M).
- Tx-tax burn tokens – Safemoon, EverReflect, etc.; tax 1–2% on every transfer, split between burn and holders.
- Revenue burners – Binance uses ~20% of quarterly profit to buy & burn BNB until 100M left.
- Sink economies – AXS breeding fees, STEP’N shoe-minting, ENS registration costs—tokens vanish as users consume services.
Live Examples (verify latest burns yourself)
- BNB – Auto-burn formula + quarterly profit burns; target 100M left.
- Ethereum (post-1559) – Base fee burned every block; net supply can deflate when usage is high.
- Shiba Inu – Team burns portions of treasury and NFT mint proceeds; community runs “burn playlists.”
- Fantom (FTM) – Governance voted to burn 10% of block rewards; plus on-chain fees burned.
- KCS (KuCoin Token) – Daily buy-back & burn from exchange revenue.
Benefits
- Scarcity narrative – easy for retail to grasp “number go down, price go up.”
- Holder alignment – fee-funded burns tie network activity to token value capture.
- Auditable – burn addresses and tx taxes are visible on-chain; no black-box repurchases.
- Marketing spice – deflationary pitch attracts early liquidity and social media buzz.
Risks & Side Effects
- Liquidity shrink – excessive burns can thin order-books and increase volatility.
- Hoarding incentive – users delay spending if they expect tomorrow’s token to be scarcer (bad for utility coins).
- Perverse taxes – high transfer taxes discourage arbitrage and CEX listings.
- Fundamental mask – teams may hype burns to hide lack of product-market fit.
- Centralised burns – admin-key burns or undisclosed buy-backs can be paused or reversed.
Due-Diligence Checklist
- Read tokenomics paper – is burn % fixed or governance mutable?
- Inspect burn address on explorer – confirm supply is really destroyed.
- Check burn size vs float – 0.01% monthly is cosmetic; 2%+ can matter.
- Revenue source – protocol revenue burns are stronger than inflationary mint→burn loops.
- Audit & code – ensure burn logic can’t be disabled or upgraded maliciously.
- Demand side – burns help only if users, fees, or real sinks exist.
Final Thoughts
Deflationary design is a scalpel, not a magic wand. When tied to genuine usage (fees, sinks, revenue) it can tighten supply and reward long-term holders. When used as a marketing gimmick—tiny burns, endless mint, or opaque buy-backs—it adds noise without value. Treat every “burn” headline with scepticism: verify on-chain evidence, weigh demand drivers, and never let smoke substitute for substance.