Deflationary Coins
12,550 coins #9 Page 19| | Coins | | | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | |||||
| The coins below are ranked lower due to missing data. Learn more | |||||
| | 901 | | $ | +0.05% | |
| | 902 | | $ | -8.58% | |
| | 903 | | $ | -7.56% | |
| | 904 | | $ | -0.14% | |
| | 905 | | $ | -5.25% | |
| | 906 | | $ | -8.67% | |
| | 907 | | $ | -1.63% | |
| | 908 | | $ | -5.95% | |
| | 909 | | $ | -5.08% | |
| | 910 | | $ | -6.95% | |
| | 911 | | $ | -39.89% | |
| | 912 | | $ | -6.15% | |
| | 913 | | $ | +1.25% | |
| | 914 | | $ | -10.97% | |
| | 915 | | $ | -4.46% | |
| | 916 | | $ | -1.89% | |
| | 917 | | $ | -4.80% | |
| | 918 | | $ | +0.17% | |
| | 919 | | $ | -0.96% | |
| | 920 | | $ | +3.20% | |
| | 921 | | $ | -0.01% | |
| | 922 | | $ | -6.40% | |
| | 923 | | $ | -8.20% | |
| | 924 | | $ | +0.00% | |
| | 925 | | $ | +2.21% | |
| | 926 | | $ | -0.16% | |
| | 927 | | $ | -8.75% | |
| | 928 | | $ | -4.41% | |
| | 929 | | $ | -6.97% | |
| | 930 | | $ | -4.72% | |
| | 931 | | $ | +5.25% | |
| | 932 | | $ | +0.35% | |
| | 933 | | $ | -1.99% | |
| | 934 | | $ | -4.84% | |
| | 935 | | $ | -5.47% | |
| | 936 | | $ | -1.86% | |
| | 937 | | $ | -3.85% | |
| | 938 | | $ | +0.00% | |
| | 939 | | $ | -21.01% | |
| | 940 | | $ | -36.92% | |
| | 941 | | $ | -12.44% | |
| | 942 | | $ | -8.41% | |
| | 943 | | $ | -5.98% | |
| | 944 | | $ | -9.33% | |
| | 945 | | $ | -5.39% | |
| | 946 | | $ | +0.00% | |
| | 947 | | $ | -15.63% | |
| | 948 | | $ | -7.60% | |
| | 949 | | $ | -2.59% | |
| | 950 | | $ | -8.33% | |
Trending Deflationary Coins
| Coins | Price | 24h | |
|---|---|---|---|
| | | $ | -7.36% |
| | | $ | -7.48% |
| | | $ | -5.08% |
| | | $ | -4.90% |
| | | $ | -0.28% |
Top gainers
| Coins | | | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | $ | +67.77% | ||
| | | $ | +46.54% | ||
| | | $ | +35.03% | ||
| | | $ | +34.39% | ||
| | | $ | +23.62% | ||
| All gainers | |||||
What Are Deflationary Tokens?
Deflationary tokens are cryptocurrencies engineered to shrink circulating supply over time. Through burns, buy-backs, or ever-slower issuance, they aim to create scarcity that—if demand holds or grows—may push unit prices higher. The mechanism is transparent and on-chain, but never a guarantee of value; utility and market interest still rule.
Quick Facts
- Core idea: Net-reduction in tokens (or in issuance rate) → potential supply/demand asymmetry.
- Burn mechanics:
- Protocol burns – % of every tx auto-destroyed (e.g., 1% of each transfer).
- Buy-back & burn – team/DAO uses revenue to market-buy tokens and send to 0x…dEaD.
- Scheduled burns – quarterly events, milestone burns, or halving-like block-reward drops.
- Utility sinks – tokens spent in-game, for NFT mints, or naming services are permanently removed.
- Transparency: Burns are viewable on-chain; verify contract code and burn address supply.
- ≠ price up only: A 50% supply drop with 90% demand loss still nets lower market cap.
Deflationary Patterns You’ll Meet
- Capped-supply + falling issuance – Bitcoin-style halvings (dis-inflationary until 21M).
- Tx-tax burn tokens – Safemoon, EverReflect, etc.; tax 1–2% on every transfer, split between burn and holders.
- Revenue burners – Binance uses ~20% of quarterly profit to buy & burn BNB until 100M left.
- Sink economies – AXS breeding fees, STEP’N shoe-minting, ENS registration costs—tokens vanish as users consume services.
Live Examples (verify latest burns yourself)
- BNB – Auto-burn formula + quarterly profit burns; target 100M left.
- Ethereum (post-1559) – Base fee burned every block; net supply can deflate when usage is high.
- Shiba Inu – Team burns portions of treasury and NFT mint proceeds; community runs “burn playlists.”
- Fantom (FTM) – Governance voted to burn 10% of block rewards; plus on-chain fees burned.
- KCS (KuCoin Token) – Daily buy-back & burn from exchange revenue.
Benefits
- Scarcity narrative – easy for retail to grasp “number go down, price go up.”
- Holder alignment – fee-funded burns tie network activity to token value capture.
- Auditable – burn addresses and tx taxes are visible on-chain; no black-box repurchases.
- Marketing spice – deflationary pitch attracts early liquidity and social media buzz.
Risks & Side Effects
- Liquidity shrink – excessive burns can thin order-books and increase volatility.
- Hoarding incentive – users delay spending if they expect tomorrow’s token to be scarcer (bad for utility coins).
- Perverse taxes – high transfer taxes discourage arbitrage and CEX listings.
- Fundamental mask – teams may hype burns to hide lack of product-market fit.
- Centralised burns – admin-key burns or undisclosed buy-backs can be paused or reversed.
Due-Diligence Checklist
- Read tokenomics paper – is burn % fixed or governance mutable?
- Inspect burn address on explorer – confirm supply is really destroyed.
- Check burn size vs float – 0.01% monthly is cosmetic; 2%+ can matter.
- Revenue source – protocol revenue burns are stronger than inflationary mint→burn loops.
- Audit & code – ensure burn logic can’t be disabled or upgraded maliciously.
- Demand side – burns help only if users, fees, or real sinks exist.
Final Thoughts
Deflationary design is a scalpel, not a magic wand. When tied to genuine usage (fees, sinks, revenue) it can tighten supply and reward long-term holders. When used as a marketing gimmick—tiny burns, endless mint, or opaque buy-backs—it adds noise without value. Treat every “burn” headline with scepticism: verify on-chain evidence, weigh demand drivers, and never let smoke substitute for substance.