Deflationary Coins
12,550 coins #9 Page 10| | Coins | | | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | |||||
| The coins below are ranked lower due to missing data. Learn more | |||||
| | 451 | | $ | +12.34% | |
| | 452 | | $ | -2.11% | |
| | 453 | | $ | -0.32% | |
| | 454 | | $ | -0.92% | |
| | 455 | | $ | -6.68% | |
| | 456 | | $ | -0.15% | |
| | 457 | | $ | +0.11% | |
| | 458 | | $ | -0.08% | |
| | 459 | | $ | -12.63% | |
| | 460 | | $ | +3.12% | |
| | 461 | | $ | +4.93% | |
| | 462 | | $ | -2.45% | |
| | 463 | | $ | -0.58% | |
| | 464 | | $ | -0.55% | |
| | 465 | | $ | +8.26% | |
| | 466 | | $ | +1.84% | |
| | 467 | | $ | +4.02% | |
| | 468 | | $ | +0.00% | |
| | 469 | | $ | +0.94% | |
| | 470 | | $ | +0.00% | |
| | 471 | | $ | -0.94% | |
| | 472 | | $ | -0.74% | |
| | 473 | | $ | -0.62% | |
| | 474 | | $ | -2.37% | |
| | 475 | | $ | -5.02% | |
| | 476 | | $ | -2.13% | |
| | 477 | | $ | -3.30% | |
| | 478 | | $ | +13.29% | |
| | 479 | | $ | -1.29% | |
| | 480 | | $ | +4.36% | |
| | 481 | | $ | +0.67% | |
| | 482 | | $ | -0.07% | |
| | 483 | | $ | +2.20% | |
| | 484 | | $ | -0.72% | |
| | 485 | | $ | -0.82% | |
| | 486 | | $ | -2.31% | |
| | 487 | | $ | -5.77% | |
| | 488 | | $ | -1.83% | |
| | 489 | | $ | -2.33% | |
| | 490 | | $ | -5.66% | |
| | 491 | | $ | -2.90% | |
| | 492 | | $ | +0.19% | |
| | 493 | | $ | +2.06% | |
| | 494 | | $ | -1.49% | |
| | 495 | | $ | -3.86% | |
| | 496 | | $ | -1.05% | |
| | 497 | | $ | +4.93% | |
| | 498 | | $ | -21.12% | |
| | 499 | | $ | -1.60% | |
| | 500 | | $ | -0.71% | |
Trending Deflationary Coins
| Coins | Price | 24h | |
|---|---|---|---|
| | | $ | -3.80% |
| | | $ | -1.63% |
| | | $ | -0.67% |
| | | $ | -1.55% |
| | | $ | -6.71% |
Top gainers
| Coins | | | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | $ | +78.77% | ||
| | | $ | +64.38% | ||
| | | $ | +18.66% | ||
| | | $ | +12.48% | ||
| | | $ | +10.63% | ||
| All gainers | |||||
What Are Deflationary Tokens?
Deflationary tokens are cryptocurrencies engineered to shrink circulating supply over time. Through burns, buy-backs, or ever-slower issuance, they aim to create scarcity that—if demand holds or grows—may push unit prices higher. The mechanism is transparent and on-chain, but never a guarantee of value; utility and market interest still rule.
Quick Facts
- Core idea: Net-reduction in tokens (or in issuance rate) → potential supply/demand asymmetry.
- Burn mechanics:
- Protocol burns – % of every tx auto-destroyed (e.g., 1% of each transfer).
- Buy-back & burn – team/DAO uses revenue to market-buy tokens and send to 0x…dEaD.
- Scheduled burns – quarterly events, milestone burns, or halving-like block-reward drops.
- Utility sinks – tokens spent in-game, for NFT mints, or naming services are permanently removed.
- Transparency: Burns are viewable on-chain; verify contract code and burn address supply.
- ≠ price up only: A 50% supply drop with 90% demand loss still nets lower market cap.
Deflationary Patterns You’ll Meet
- Capped-supply + falling issuance – Bitcoin-style halvings (dis-inflationary until 21M).
- Tx-tax burn tokens – Safemoon, EverReflect, etc.; tax 1–2% on every transfer, split between burn and holders.
- Revenue burners – Binance uses ~20% of quarterly profit to buy & burn BNB until 100M left.
- Sink economies – AXS breeding fees, STEP’N shoe-minting, ENS registration costs—tokens vanish as users consume services.
Live Examples (verify latest burns yourself)
- BNB – Auto-burn formula + quarterly profit burns; target 100M left.
- Ethereum (post-1559) – Base fee burned every block; net supply can deflate when usage is high.
- Shiba Inu – Team burns portions of treasury and NFT mint proceeds; community runs “burn playlists.”
- Fantom (FTM) – Governance voted to burn 10% of block rewards; plus on-chain fees burned.
- KCS (KuCoin Token) – Daily buy-back & burn from exchange revenue.
Benefits
- Scarcity narrative – easy for retail to grasp “number go down, price go up.”
- Holder alignment – fee-funded burns tie network activity to token value capture.
- Auditable – burn addresses and tx taxes are visible on-chain; no black-box repurchases.
- Marketing spice – deflationary pitch attracts early liquidity and social media buzz.
Risks & Side Effects
- Liquidity shrink – excessive burns can thin order-books and increase volatility.
- Hoarding incentive – users delay spending if they expect tomorrow’s token to be scarcer (bad for utility coins).
- Perverse taxes – high transfer taxes discourage arbitrage and CEX listings.
- Fundamental mask – teams may hype burns to hide lack of product-market fit.
- Centralised burns – admin-key burns or undisclosed buy-backs can be paused or reversed.
Due-Diligence Checklist
- Read tokenomics paper – is burn % fixed or governance mutable?
- Inspect burn address on explorer – confirm supply is really destroyed.
- Check burn size vs float – 0.01% monthly is cosmetic; 2%+ can matter.
- Revenue source – protocol revenue burns are stronger than inflationary mint→burn loops.
- Audit & code – ensure burn logic can’t be disabled or upgraded maliciously.
- Demand side – burns help only if users, fees, or real sinks exist.
Final Thoughts
Deflationary design is a scalpel, not a magic wand. When tied to genuine usage (fees, sinks, revenue) it can tighten supply and reward long-term holders. When used as a marketing gimmick—tiny burns, endless mint, or opaque buy-backs—it adds noise without value. Treat every “burn” headline with scepticism: verify on-chain evidence, weigh demand drivers, and never let smoke substitute for substance.