Deflationary Coins
12,489 coins #9 Page 3| | Coins | | | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | |||||
| | 101 | | $ | -0.15% | |
| | 102 | | $ | -4.48% | |
| | 103 | | $ | +7.16% | |
| | 104 | | $ | +4.55% | |
| | 105 | | $ | +2.89% | |
| | 106 | | $ | -0.03% | |
| | 107 | | $ | +4.26% | |
| | 108 | | $ | +0.77% | |
| | 109 | | $ | -0.27% | |
| | 110 | | $ | +0.28% | |
| | 111 | | $ | +0.07% | |
| | 112 | | $ | +0.02% | |
| | 113 | | $ | +0.05% | |
| | 114 | | $ | +1.52% | |
| | 115 | | $ | -1.46% | |
| | 116 | | $ | +0.73% | |
| | 117 | | $ | +0.26% | |
| | 118 | | $ | +5.12% | |
| | 119 | | $ | -0.88% | |
| | 120 | | $ | +1.73% | |
| | 121 | | $ | +0.17% | |
| | 122 | | $ | -1.22% | |
| | 123 | | $ | -0.22% | |
| | 124 | | $ | +1.40% | |
| | 125 | | $ | +0.45% | |
| | 126 | | $ | -0.06% | |
| | 127 | | $ | +2.37% | |
| | 128 | | $ | +0.87% | |
| | 129 | | $ | -1.71% | |
| | 130 | | $ | +0.93% | |
| | 131 | | $ | +0.74% | |
| | 132 | | $ | -1.94% | |
| | 133 | | $ | +1.43% | |
| | 134 | | $ | -0.43% | |
| | 135 | | $ | -3.73% | |
| | 136 | | $ | +0.90% | |
| | 137 | | $ | +5.66% | |
| | 138 | | $ | -0.67% | |
| | 139 | | $ | +0.19% | |
| | 140 | | $ | -4.17% | |
| | 141 | | $ | +2.43% | |
| | 142 | | $ | +1.21% | |
| | 143 | | $ | +2.18% | |
| | 144 | | $ | -8.92% | |
| | 145 | | $ | -2.34% | |
| | 146 | | $ | +0.90% | |
| | 147 | | $ | +81.68% | |
| | 148 | | $ | +0.66% | |
| | 149 | | $ | +11.25% | |
| | 150 | | $ | +5.25% | |
Trending Deflationary Coins
| Coins | Price | 24h | |
|---|---|---|---|
| | | $ | -0.92% |
| | | $ | -0.15% |
| | | $ | +0.37% |
| | | $ | -0.37% |
| | | $ | -5.61% |
Top gainers
| Coins | | | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | $ | +81.68% | ||
| | | $ | +71.16% | ||
| | | $ | +37.76% | ||
| | | $ | +24.07% | ||
| | | $ | +14.58% | ||
| All gainers | |||||
What Are Deflationary Tokens?
Deflationary tokens are cryptocurrencies engineered to shrink circulating supply over time. Through burns, buy-backs, or ever-slower issuance, they aim to create scarcity that—if demand holds or grows—may push unit prices higher. The mechanism is transparent and on-chain, but never a guarantee of value; utility and market interest still rule.
Quick Facts
- Core idea: Net-reduction in tokens (or in issuance rate) → potential supply/demand asymmetry.
- Burn mechanics:
- Protocol burns – % of every tx auto-destroyed (e.g., 1% of each transfer).
- Buy-back & burn – team/DAO uses revenue to market-buy tokens and send to 0x…dEaD.
- Scheduled burns – quarterly events, milestone burns, or halving-like block-reward drops.
- Utility sinks – tokens spent in-game, for NFT mints, or naming services are permanently removed.
- Transparency: Burns are viewable on-chain; verify contract code and burn address supply.
- ≠ price up only: A 50% supply drop with 90% demand loss still nets lower market cap.
Deflationary Patterns You’ll Meet
- Capped-supply + falling issuance – Bitcoin-style halvings (dis-inflationary until 21M).
- Tx-tax burn tokens – Safemoon, EverReflect, etc.; tax 1–2% on every transfer, split between burn and holders.
- Revenue burners – Binance uses ~20% of quarterly profit to buy & burn BNB until 100M left.
- Sink economies – AXS breeding fees, STEP’N shoe-minting, ENS registration costs—tokens vanish as users consume services.
Live Examples (verify latest burns yourself)
- BNB – Auto-burn formula + quarterly profit burns; target 100M left.
- Ethereum (post-1559) – Base fee burned every block; net supply can deflate when usage is high.
- Shiba Inu – Team burns portions of treasury and NFT mint proceeds; community runs “burn playlists.”
- Fantom (FTM) – Governance voted to burn 10% of block rewards; plus on-chain fees burned.
- KCS (KuCoin Token) – Daily buy-back & burn from exchange revenue.
Benefits
- Scarcity narrative – easy for retail to grasp “number go down, price go up.”
- Holder alignment – fee-funded burns tie network activity to token value capture.
- Auditable – burn addresses and tx taxes are visible on-chain; no black-box repurchases.
- Marketing spice – deflationary pitch attracts early liquidity and social media buzz.
Risks & Side Effects
- Liquidity shrink – excessive burns can thin order-books and increase volatility.
- Hoarding incentive – users delay spending if they expect tomorrow’s token to be scarcer (bad for utility coins).
- Perverse taxes – high transfer taxes discourage arbitrage and CEX listings.
- Fundamental mask – teams may hype burns to hide lack of product-market fit.
- Centralised burns – admin-key burns or undisclosed buy-backs can be paused or reversed.
Due-Diligence Checklist
- Read tokenomics paper – is burn % fixed or governance mutable?
- Inspect burn address on explorer – confirm supply is really destroyed.
- Check burn size vs float – 0.01% monthly is cosmetic; 2%+ can matter.
- Revenue source – protocol revenue burns are stronger than inflationary mint→burn loops.
- Audit & code – ensure burn logic can’t be disabled or upgraded maliciously.
- Demand side – burns help only if users, fees, or real sinks exist.
Final Thoughts
Deflationary design is a scalpel, not a magic wand. When tied to genuine usage (fees, sinks, revenue) it can tighten supply and reward long-term holders. When used as a marketing gimmick—tiny burns, endless mint, or opaque buy-backs—it adds noise without value. Treat every “burn” headline with scepticism: verify on-chain evidence, weigh demand drivers, and never let smoke substitute for substance.