Deflationary Coins
12,518 coins #9 Page 4| | Coins | | | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | |||||
| | 151 | | $ | -0.17% | |
| | 152 | | $ | +5.68% | |
| | 153 | | $ | +1.35% | |
| | 154 | | $ | -3.37% | |
| | 155 | | $ | -2.13% | |
| | 156 | | $ | +5.13% | |
| | 157 | | $ | -2.20% | |
| | 158 | | $ | +1.47% | |
| | 159 | | $ | -8.12% | |
| | 160 | | $ | +1.87% | |
| | 161 | | $ | -1.70% | |
| | 162 | | $ | -0.10% | |
| | 163 | | $ | -2.64% | |
| | 164 | | $ | -1.44% | |
| | 165 | | $ | +0.03% | |
| | 166 | | $ | -1.07% | |
| | 167 | | $ | +5.71% | |
| | 168 | | $ | -2.20% | |
| | 169 | | $ | -1.37% | |
| | 170 | | $ | -1.92% | |
| | 171 | | $ | -0.28% | |
| | 172 | | $ | +0.29% | |
| | 173 | | $ | -6.04% | |
| | 174 | | $ | +2.54% | |
| | 175 | | $ | -0.61% | |
| | 176 | | $ | +0.04% | |
| | 177 | | $ | -4.00% | |
| | 178 | | $ | +8.45% | |
| | 179 | | $ | -0.81% | |
| | 180 | | $ | -1.28% | |
| | 181 | | $ | -3.59% | |
| | 182 | | $ | -4.58% | |
| | 183 | | $ | -7.11% | |
| | 184 | | $ | +17.91% | |
| | 185 | | $ | -0.51% | |
| | 186 | | $ | -0.53% | |
| | 187 | | $ | -4.93% | |
| | 188 | | $ | -5.21% | |
| | 189 | | $ | -0.09% | |
| | 190 | | $ | -2.14% | |
| | 191 | | $ | +0.16% | |
| | 192 | | $ | -1.49% | |
| | 193 | | $ | -0.68% | |
| | 194 | | $ | +4.51% | |
| | 195 | | $ | +5.47% | |
| | 196 | | $ | -0.68% | |
| | 197 | | $ | +0.81% | |
| | 198 | | $ | -0.45% | |
| | 199 | | $ | -0.30% | |
| | 200 | | $ | +10.84% | |
Trending Deflationary Coins
| Coins | Price | 24h | |
|---|---|---|---|
| | | $ | -0.38% |
| | | $ | -0.09% |
| | | $ | +0.04% |
| | | $ | -0.68% |
| | | $ | -5.98% |
Top gainers
| Coins | | | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | $ | +103.18% | ||
| | | $ | +77.77% | ||
| | | $ | +52.44% | ||
| | | $ | +18.66% | ||
| | | $ | +17.91% | ||
| All gainers | |||||
What Are Deflationary Tokens?
Deflationary tokens are cryptocurrencies engineered to shrink circulating supply over time. Through burns, buy-backs, or ever-slower issuance, they aim to create scarcity that—if demand holds or grows—may push unit prices higher. The mechanism is transparent and on-chain, but never a guarantee of value; utility and market interest still rule.
Quick Facts
- Core idea: Net-reduction in tokens (or in issuance rate) → potential supply/demand asymmetry.
- Burn mechanics:
- Protocol burns – % of every tx auto-destroyed (e.g., 1% of each transfer).
- Buy-back & burn – team/DAO uses revenue to market-buy tokens and send to 0x…dEaD.
- Scheduled burns – quarterly events, milestone burns, or halving-like block-reward drops.
- Utility sinks – tokens spent in-game, for NFT mints, or naming services are permanently removed.
- Transparency: Burns are viewable on-chain; verify contract code and burn address supply.
- ≠ price up only: A 50% supply drop with 90% demand loss still nets lower market cap.
Deflationary Patterns You’ll Meet
- Capped-supply + falling issuance – Bitcoin-style halvings (dis-inflationary until 21M).
- Tx-tax burn tokens – Safemoon, EverReflect, etc.; tax 1–2% on every transfer, split between burn and holders.
- Revenue burners – Binance uses ~20% of quarterly profit to buy & burn BNB until 100M left.
- Sink economies – AXS breeding fees, STEP’N shoe-minting, ENS registration costs—tokens vanish as users consume services.
Live Examples (verify latest burns yourself)
- BNB – Auto-burn formula + quarterly profit burns; target 100M left.
- Ethereum (post-1559) – Base fee burned every block; net supply can deflate when usage is high.
- Shiba Inu – Team burns portions of treasury and NFT mint proceeds; community runs “burn playlists.”
- Fantom (FTM) – Governance voted to burn 10% of block rewards; plus on-chain fees burned.
- KCS (KuCoin Token) – Daily buy-back & burn from exchange revenue.
Benefits
- Scarcity narrative – easy for retail to grasp “number go down, price go up.”
- Holder alignment – fee-funded burns tie network activity to token value capture.
- Auditable – burn addresses and tx taxes are visible on-chain; no black-box repurchases.
- Marketing spice – deflationary pitch attracts early liquidity and social media buzz.
Risks & Side Effects
- Liquidity shrink – excessive burns can thin order-books and increase volatility.
- Hoarding incentive – users delay spending if they expect tomorrow’s token to be scarcer (bad for utility coins).
- Perverse taxes – high transfer taxes discourage arbitrage and CEX listings.
- Fundamental mask – teams may hype burns to hide lack of product-market fit.
- Centralised burns – admin-key burns or undisclosed buy-backs can be paused or reversed.
Due-Diligence Checklist
- Read tokenomics paper – is burn % fixed or governance mutable?
- Inspect burn address on explorer – confirm supply is really destroyed.
- Check burn size vs float – 0.01% monthly is cosmetic; 2%+ can matter.
- Revenue source – protocol revenue burns are stronger than inflationary mint→burn loops.
- Audit & code – ensure burn logic can’t be disabled or upgraded maliciously.
- Demand side – burns help only if users, fees, or real sinks exist.
Final Thoughts
Deflationary design is a scalpel, not a magic wand. When tied to genuine usage (fees, sinks, revenue) it can tighten supply and reward long-term holders. When used as a marketing gimmick—tiny burns, endless mint, or opaque buy-backs—it adds noise without value. Treat every “burn” headline with scepticism: verify on-chain evidence, weigh demand drivers, and never let smoke substitute for substance.